The locked-in syndrome (LIS), in which persons are conscious but almost entirely paralyzed and voiceless, is one of the most dramatic states a human being can find himself or herself in. This interdisciplinary international workshop will bring together cognitive neuroscientists, care and neuro-rehabilitation professionals, brain-computer interface experts, individuals involved in LIS patients associations, philosophers, bioethicists, medical anthropologists and sociologists, and historians of the brain\/mind sciences to discuss the impact this unique condition has on ways of understanding personhood at the theoretical and practical levels.<\/p>\n
While the philosophy of personhood in the Western tradition since the late 17th century has emphasized cognitive capacities and self-consciousness, the experience of LIS contributes to open new ground for understanding how relationality, emotion, communication and phenomenal consciousness (the feeling of what it is like to be in a certain state) are constitutive of personal identity and the sense of self.<\/p>\n
17 and 18 November 2016
\nSala de Juntas, Facultad de Filosof\u00eda y Letras,
\nAutonomous University of Barcelona<\/p>\n
PROGRAM<\/p>\n
Thursday 17 November<\/span><\/p>\n 10:00-11:00 h 11:00-11:30 h 11:30-12:00 h 12:00-12:30 h Discussion<\/p>\n 12:30-14:00 h Lunch<\/p>\n 14:00-14:30 h 14:30-15:00 h 15:00:15:30 h Discussion<\/p>\n 15:30-15:45 h Break<\/p>\n 15:45-16:15 h 16:15-16:45 h 16:45-17:00 h Break<\/p>\n 17:00-17:30 h Discussion<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Friday 18 November<\/span><\/p>\n 10:00-10:30 h 10:30-11:00 h 11:00-11:30 h Discussion<\/p>\n 11:30-11:45 h Break<\/p>\n 11:45-12:15 h 12:15-12:45 h 12:45-13:15 h Discussion<\/p>\n 13:15-14:45 h Lunch<\/p>\n 14:45-15:15 h 15:15-15:45 h 15:45-16:15 h Discussion<\/p>\n 16:15-17:00 h Break<\/p>\n 17:00-17:30 h 17:30-18:00 h 18:00-18:15 h Break<\/p>\n 18:15-19:15 h Discussion + Closing<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The locked-in syndrome (LIS), in which persons are conscious but almost entirely paralyzed and voiceless, is one of the most dramatic states a human being can find himself or herself in. This interdisciplinary international workshop will bring together cognitive neuroscientists, care and neuro-rehabilitation professionals, brain-computer interface experts, individuals involved in LIS patients associations, philosophers, bioethicists, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":34,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/arban.espais.iec.cat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4450"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/arban.espais.iec.cat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/arban.espais.iec.cat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arban.espais.iec.cat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/34"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arban.espais.iec.cat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4450"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/arban.espais.iec.cat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4450\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4454,"href":"https:\/\/arban.espais.iec.cat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4450\/revisions\/4454"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/arban.espais.iec.cat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4450"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arban.espais.iec.cat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4450"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/arban.espais.iec.cat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4450"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nWelcome. Organization and Introduction,
\nFernando Vidal<\/strong> and N\u00faria Terribas<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nThe Self and the Person: A Distinction of Relevance for Patients with Locked-In Syndrome?
\nDan Zahavi<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nBeing Alive: An Enactive Approach to the Self,
\nMiriam Kyselo<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nReconstructing and Realizing a Life Project in LIS: Conditions and Limits,
\nV\u00e9ronique Blandin<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nLiving with a Ventilator: A Japanese Perspective,
\nYumiko Kawaguchi<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nThe History of BCI (Brain-Computer Interface): From a Vision to Independent Home
\nUse by Locked-in Patients,
\nAndrea K\u00fcbler<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nBCI for Communication in Locked-in Syndromes: What is Needed to Match Users and Technology,
\nDonatella Mattia<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nLocked-in Patients\/Lockedout Doctors: A History of Persistent States of Being There,
\nStephen Casper<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nThe Locked-in State as a Final Stage of Individuation: A Phenomenological and Qualitative Analysis of a Caregiver\u2019s Narrative,
\nYasuhiko Murakami<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nWhich Factors Foster Resilience in the LIS?,
\nMarie-Christine Nizzi<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nBeing Locked-In and the Paradox of Disability,
\nBernab\u00e9 Robles del Olmo<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nLocked-in Syndrome: The Soul Far From the Body,
\nNicole Beaudoin<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nLife at Home Years After Hospital Discharge: \u201cBed of Roses\u201d or \u201cRebel Without a cause\u201d?
\nAn Analysis of Breakdown Situations at Home,
\n Fr\u00e9d\u00e9ric Pellas<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nNeuroethical Implications of Clinician\u2019s Attitudes Toward the Locked-in Syndrome,
\nAthena Demertzi<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nMedical Decision Making by Patients with Locked-In Syndrome,
\nJames L. Bernat<\/strong><\/p>\n